This is part of a series about quantifying the cultural relevance of music. See Part 2: When Future Generations Don’t Remember the Classics and Part 3: The Future of Music from 2013.
TL;DR: Spotify plays are a good signal for the longevity of old music. And No Diggity wins.
I have this theory: let’s say it’s 2050. I’m old. With grandchildren. They’re like, “Gramps, what music did you jam to, back in the day.” And I’m like, “Suzy” – yea, in 2050, we still use OG names like Suzy – “I jammed to No Diggity by Blackstreet , not that garbage you kids listen to today.”
But Suzy’s like, “Gramps, No Diggity is my jam too.” In 2050, The world has forgotten most 90s music. They’re listening to some cacophony of dubstep and trap. But not No Diggity, still played at Bar Mitzvahs. Weddings. All the places.
I want to prove this: future generations will fondly revere No Diggity.
Proof means data. Yea, No Diggity is a great song, but I grew up with it. I’m biased. I can name like, maybe, 5 musicians from the 1930s. That’s the bar in 2050 for 90s music. One of five. Everything else is dust. If No Diggity stands a chance in 2050, the incoming generation, those not alive at the time of its release, need to love this song, even over all of the other crap released in the 90s.
The data is in Spotify. Spotify tells us that the average 16-year-old girl loves some One Direction/Justin Bieber/Drake amalgamation. Spotify measures the number of plays of every song, every week, and releases a big ole' chart.
So I did the same thing. Except for old shit. For a 16-year-old girl, birthed 4 years after No Diggity’s release, what are her top-played songs from the 90s on Spotify?
I made an old music top-25 chart, ranked by Spotify plays. This is how we quantify the longevity of No Diggity.